perm filename VP124[C9,LCS] blob
sn#461022 filedate 1979-07-23 generic text, type T, neo UTF8
00100 . DEVICE XGP
00200 .spacing 20*5 mills;
00300 .EVERY HEADING(,{PAGE},)
00400 .AREA TEXT LINES 4 TO 40
00500 .FONT 1 "MBIG[HHA,LCS]"
00600 .font 2 "BMETI[HHA,LCS]"
00700 .font 4 "BMUS[HHA,LCS]"
00800 .font 6 "MBIG[HHA,LCS]"
00900 .!XGPLFTMAR←400
01000 .PORTION MAIN;
01100 .PLACE TEXT;
01200 .PAGE FRAME 138 WIDE 106 HIGH;
01300 .COMPACT
01400 .COUNT PAGE FROM 1 TO 999;
01500 .<< THICKEN UNDERLINE >>
01600 .AT "↓_" ⊂ SNEAK(BEWARE("'177'1'46"))⊃;
01700 .AT "_↓" ⊂ SNEAK(BEWARE("'177'1'51'4'4"))⊃;
01800 .<< Put in a footnote. >>
01900 .
02000 .COUNT FOOTNOTE INLINE FROM 1 TO 999 IN PAGE PRINTING ⊂"*****"[1 TO FOOTNOTE]⊃
02100 .<< (IF THISDEVICE = "XGP" THEN "%51%*" ELSE "[1]");>>
02200 .
02300 .FOOTSEP ← "__________";
02400 .AT "$$" ENTRY "$"
02500 . ⊂
02600 . NEXT FOOTNOTE;
02700 . FOOTNOTE!;
02800 . SEND FOOT
02900 . ⊂
03000 . BEGIN "NEXT FOOTNOTE"
03100 . SELECT 1;
03200 . SINGLE SPACE
03300 . SPACING 0 MILLS
03400 . INDENT 0,0,0;
03500 . (FOOTNOTE! & " ");
03600 ENTRY
03700 . END "NEXT FOOTNOTE";
03800 . ⊃;
03900 . ⊃;
04000 .
04100 .TURN ON "%↓_↑↓[&]","α"
04200 .at "!!" txt ";" ⊂
04300 .("↑[%3"&"txt"[1]&"]&↓["&"txt"[2]&"]%*");
04400 .COMMENT ("txt"[1]&"↑[%3"&"txt"[2]&"]&↓["&"txt"[3]&"]%*");
04500 . ⊃
00100 .PAGE←123
00200 .NEXT PAGE
00300 .FILL INDENT 12
00400 The difficulty in analyzing this last half of the development
00500 section stems mainly from the ambiguity of function in the long string
00600 of ascending seventh chords. Even though a satisfactory analysis of the
00700 tonal bases can be worked out here, it is obvious that our comprehension
00800 of such passages depends greatly on the much less problematical element
00900 of motivic continuity. It will be seen later how the functional
01000 ambiguity of late 19th-century music led to a situation wherein the
01100 motivic or, more broadly speaking, contextual element took over the
01200 primary organizational role from tonal harmony.
01300
01400 The recapitulation of this Mozart movement offers no new
01500 complications. The few new tonics can easily be identified.
01600
01700 It will be noticed that most of the work on the role of the
01800 piece's more complex chromaticism has been assumed during the
01900 preceding discussion. This can hardly be otherwise, even when
02000 approaching a work from the largest view first. The more complicated
02100 the details are, the more difficult it usually becomes to form an
02200 immediate view of the larger tonal movements. The same will often
02300 prove true concerning the other of the first three analytical
02400 procedures outlined in Chapter VIII. What questions that may be
02500 left in this area will probably be covered in the discussion which
02600 follows the complete analysis of the movement.
02700 .BEGIN VERBATIM
02800
02900 Figure 94. Mozart, Sonata in F, K.533,
03000 second movement (Andante).
03100 .END
03200 .CENTER
03300 %6⊂⊗⊃L[α%0.04,α%-3.10](17,22):N94FA.PLT[C9,LCS]⊂⊗⊃%1